Deregulation

  • NTV and deregulation: a new era for rail?

    Last month the NTV Italo, owned by Ferrari boss Luca Cordero di Montezemolo, and boasting a top speed of 300 kilometres per hour completed its first full service trip from Naples. The distinctive red bullet trains will initially run a high-speed service along the newly built Milan-Florence-Rome-Naples route, with a view to gradually expanding across Europe. As the first privately owned, high-speed train, the birth of the NTV Italo is a momentous moment for the international rail industry.
    However, it is not just the new trains that are significant, but NTV itself as it is the first rail venture to be developed as a direct result of European deregulation. It is the first concrete proof that, with the ability to operate across Europe, entrepreneurs are seeing a wealth of potential opportunity and revenue to be had in backing or setting up rail companies. Arguably, the consumer choice that this will bring is good news for the traveller. As we can see from the airline industry, a competitive market can drive down prices, cut journey times and improve customer experience. For the first time European rail travellers will have a choice of the carriers and services that they would like to use. In Italy, this has not been the case for the last 150 years.
    Furthermore, private high speed companies such as this, which offer an airline based model of tiered seating and ancillary services will also provide a genuinely competitive alternative to travelling by air. The NTV is already taking on one of Europe’s busiest city-to-city journeys – Naples–Rome and with a journey time of just three hours and no long wait at the terminal, it is a worthy adversary.
    As new companies enter the market we can expect to see an increasingly fragmented and complex competitive environment and this will have far reaching effects on the future face of the rail industry. As national rail companies have to state to compete for domestic routes, they will need to upgrade their services and focus on the needs of the individual traveller in a way that has not traditionally been the case. Adopting next-generation distribution systems which enable them to reach the traveller through the most appropriate channel, be that direct or indirect, and which will allow travellers to book cross-border or cross-organisation journeys on one ticket, will be key to achieving this. So too will the ability to offer ancillary services and personalised journeys.
    By the same token, new ventures will need to adopt new and innovative systems if they are to carve a place in the market for themselves against established and trusted brands. With travellers increasingly demanding a seamless door-to-door journey, we can expect to see an increasing number of rail companies looking to adopt mobile ticketing technology which will allow customers to simply turn up and board the train, with no queuing and no need for a paper ticket, as well as to modify and update their journey from their mobile device.
    Finally, if rail companies are seriously going to compete against short-haul flights they will need technology that allows them to display their product alongside air products on any given city pair. This will give travellers greater choice and visibility of high-speed rail as a viable alternative to air travel. With deregulation as the driver, and innovative new technology as the enabler, the launch of NTV could be just the beginning of a new era for rail.

    Read more...

  • Back on track to the future

    As we mentioned in our air-rail intermodality blogs last year, there is still a way to go before our vision of a fully integrated air-rail network is realised. The current lack of alliances between airlines and rail operators can be attributed in some part to factors such as the lack of government investment in the necessary infrastructure to support air-rail connectivity.
    However, this is not the case when it comes to rail-to-rail alliances. The onset of deregulation and the expansion of high speed rail networks across Europe are causing ever longer distances to be travelled by rail. As a result, passengers are increasingly demanding a similar service from rail operators to that which is offered by airlines – whereby their journey can be searched for and booked end-to-end, in one place and on one ticket, regardless of if it traverses both borders and rail companies.
    At the end of January we launched a whitepaper entitled Back on Track. Authored by Professor James Woudhuysen, the paper argues that next generation technologies are making these alliances possible for the rail industry. Back on Track showcases the success the airline industry experienced following migration from legacy IT to a next generation system and argues that the rail industry could learn from some of these examples.
    An outsourced community platform, a shared system used by rival rail companies to manage customer processing, means rail companies would benefit from the latest technology whilst remaining free to innovate and differentiate. Increased partnership across the industry will remove the stress, uncertainty and chaos which are usually associated with rail travel in the 21st Century, as well as providing much richer, deeper and more personal travel experiences, allowing for personalised journeys, the selling of ancillary services and multiple options for ticketing.
    In addition, the cross industry use of community IT systems would mean that rail companies could rely on a business community with shared interests to support commercial developments such as network collaboration.
    As detailed in the global industry study we commissioned from The Futures Company, From Chaos to Collaboration, a combination of transformative technologies, evolving social values and trends are establishing a new era of travel. The companies that will thrive in this new era are those that meet these new expectations with innovation and a shift to the partnerships and collaborations that will enable this.
    The technologies to facilitate such a shift already exist; it is now in the hands of the industry to think more creatively and build more collaborative partnerships to deploy these new initiatives to full effect. If rail operators are to continue to modernise, grow and compete with airlines it is essential that they recognise this need for collaboration within the industry and begin to act.

    Read more...

  • Outsourcing: nothing to fear but fear itself?

     

    Read more...

  • Rail BSP – myth or reality?

    When talking to railway companies and travel agencies about rail distribution in Europe, one topic always comes back in the discussion: “there is no rail BSP”.

    Let’s go back to the basics first and try to understand what BSP is and what it does for the airline world.

    BSP – or Billing and Settlement Plan – is a system administered by IATA, the International Air transport Association, in order to facilitate the sales, remittance and reporting between airlines and IATA accredited travel agencies. Global, the BSP system covers more than 160 countries and territories, serving about 400 airlines for a gross sales amount of US$ 191 billion in 2009 - more on iata.org.

    In addition to the guarantees it provides to airlines about agency accreditation, the true value of the BSP for airlines is a reliable credit management collection through one single standard interface for invoicing and payment.

    There is actually one BSP-like system in the rail industry: ATOC Rail Settlement plan - it acts the same way as the IATA BSP for UK rail operators, simplifying the payment between railways and rail travel sellers in the UK. It also sets standards for booking and ticketing – more on atoc.org.

    Could this be applied elsewhere then?

    Well, ATOC works in the UK: one market, one currency, one set of standards for multiple providers. Extending this BSP system to Europe might be feasible but: who will be in charge of it? Who will run it? Who will participate in it? 

    A first option would be for railways to work together and create such a representative body like IATA, to neutrally represent their interests and build a Rail BSP. The biggest challenge to implement such a system remains the railways themselves and their willingness to cooperate. This is definitely a long-term approach that could take many years to come to life.

    Another option would be for a third party to start such a system with one rail operator in one country, before expanding the system to other operators - this is a progressive approach, short to medium term, that could well be a helpful kick start in such a complex market place.

    Yet, the question of “who” still remains – any candidates?

    Read more...

« newer
Page 1 of 3    123

Latest Twitter

Head of Marketing Amadeus Rail

  • Loading twitter updates...

Join us on LinkedIn

Welcome to Totally Rail (audio)

Amadeus Totally Rail Blog site intro (mp3)

Sign up for our newsletter

Privacy Policy

Industry Websites